Welcome, Guest!
Log in Here
No account?
Sign up! It's free!
 
Show All Latest
 Top Soapboxes 
Politics Politics
People People
Science & Tech Science & Tech
Work & Money Work & Money
Pop Culture Pop Culture
More Soapboxes
 
Post Now!
 
Find Posts

Advanced Find
 
Links
About the Nation
FAQ / Help
Be an Aristocrat!
Contact Us
 
Be a Fan!
Follow Us!
DID BIG BANKS CAUSE ECONOMY to CRASH? | Soapbox Nation
 
DID BIG BANKS CAUSE ECONOMY to CRASH?
 fav 
By outofoverdrive , at 02/08/2010 12:27 PM to Politics
Reputation Level: 66 - Post Count: 3
Location: California USA
Yeah!18 Boo!None
If you think big banks are the chief culprits in the burst of the housing bubble and disasterous economy that followed, please read today's Wall Street Journal "Review & Outlook" on the opinion page titled "Prosecuter, Charge Thyself". (WSJ FEB 8,2010 PGA20) This is a very eye-opening account of how the fault for this economy can be directly tied to the Clinton Administration, Andrew Cuomo, HUD plus Fannie & Freddie. Yes, Bush can take some of the blame for not being more forceful in curbing some of the activities by these people and agencies, but let's spread the blame a little bit here gang!
Tags: greed, banks
6 Shoutbacks so far Add Your Own!
  
Show Me The:
Let your voice be heard... shoutback to this post!
 
Stuff & Things
 By:  agentrnge , at 02/09/2010 3:52 PM
 Reputation Level: 44
Yeah!1 Boo!None
I feel the problems we face boil down to the lack of responsibility of the citizens of this nation. Yes, decisions for pulling back regulations were made during the Clinton administrations that allowed banks and financial institutions to gamble on us the way they did. Yes they continued to be further loosened during the Bush years.

The housing market was exploding with people who made far too little and were betting on the value of their home and properties doubling every few years. The big banks were betting with the same optimism about all their loans coming back making crazy money off the consumers. Assuming that mortgage values could keep inflating, supporting bigger sales and bigger mortgages. All this phantom money passing back and forth selling a home every year back and forth between different owners each bumping up the price another $50-100k each time they did this. Each time a new closing went though, ultimately one of those big banks was skimming something off the top. Now they could make money off the same house by several different mortgages all being traded back and forth within the middle teir banks.

I was seriously looking for homes when this explosion was happening. I recall joking that 1/2 the homes I passed had For Sale signs on them. Every 6 months a different Realtor company.

I knew what I could afford. I knew I needed to count on my interest rate staying a certain level. I knew what kind of payments I could maintain.... (show all)
 
 
Politics
 By:  rainy , at 02/12/2010 10:59 PM
 Reputation Level: 182
Yeah!3 Boo!None
Quoted Shoutback:
... I must place primary blame on the people.


I must disagree with agentrnge's shoutback. The 'people' were just the fish that took the bait. I do agree, that greed and ignorance were rampant among home buyers, sellers, mortgage brokers and realtors - like a feeding frenzy - but were not at all primarily to blame for the housing bubble.

When government policy opens a floodgate of policies effecting the free market, such as 'outofoverdrive' brings to our attention in the WSJ, it was equivalent to throwing food to hungry sharks. It becomes obvious that the events that led up to the bubble bursting were strategic outcomes of some poorly thought out political policy.

I've always thought that this world-wide economic disaster and the subsequent bail-out fiasco was the fault of a few conniving, selfish entities. It is - in a sense, to continue the analogy, the work of greedy fisherman filling their nets with as much as they could get away with.

It is my hope that they, themselves, get caught and stand trial for what could well be considered, the largest theft of wealth, productivity and prosperity in the history of the World.


 
 
Politics
 By:  "LOLDONGS", at 02/16/2010 1:00 PM
Yeah!3 Boo!None
PROTIP: If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage. If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage.

I LOVE PAYING EXCESSIVE TAXES BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND BASIC MATHEMATIC AND ECONOMIC MECHANISMS BUT STILL BELIEVE THEY CAN MAKE A PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS.
LIQUIFY THE STUPID.
 
 
Politics
 By:  "ECONOMICS 101", at 02/19/2010 8:32 PM
Yeah!2 Boo!None
Quoted Shoutback:
If you're a single mother working at Denny's, you cannot afford a $240,000 mortgage.

I LOVE PAYING EXCESSIVE TAXES BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND BASIC MATHEMATIC AND ECONOMIC MECHANISMS BUT STILL BELIEVE THEY CAN MAKE A PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS.
LIQUIFY THE STUPID.

No one should be approved to borrow a quarter of a million dollars unless they qualify. LIQUEFY The STUPID should be shared with the many entities to blame for this mess. Shame on the banks for offering products that qualified the unqualified, Realtors that sold them on homeownership, mortgage brokers that sold a product based on their own gain, Wall Street traders that sold the bundled debt, and the legislators that brought on this whole mess by encouraging the liberal initiative that EVERY American should own a home regardless of circumstance.

If you were a single mom working at Denny's, prior to the legislation that enabled banks to make these outrageous loans, you would have been escorted to the front door - ASAP. Before this craziness, lenders only approved mortgages based on 20% down, and monthly payments not to exceed 25% of gross monthly salary. It was not unusual that a married couple with a 20% down payment, excellent credit and two incomes above the 25% monthly limit, were denied a mortgage because the young wom... (show all)
 
 
 
Stuff & Things
 By:  agentrnge , at 02/23/2010 6:37 PM
 Reputation Level: 44
Yeah!1 Boo!None
Yes I will admit that the changes in policy allowed lenders to lend to higher risk borrowers. Yes that allowed them to make more sales, more frequently. Yes the Denny's waitress living in fantasy land could get a mortgage.

I like the idea of government keeping its hands out of as many things as possible. Unfortunately people will continue to make bad decisions, and neglect common sense. As a result we have hundreds of thousands of governmental laws, hundreds of thousands of corporate policies, hundreds of thousands of financial regulations, attempting to compensate for lack of common sense.

If the laws state I am allowed to go 150 mph on a road, that does not mean I can, or that it is safe, or that my situation or condition will even allow it to be possible.

I maintain the view that we as individuals are responsible for our actions.

If we act responsibly, governments, corporations, and financial monstrosities will not need to hold our hands and attempt to think for us. This hand holding and constrictive guidance only limits our freedom.
 
 
Politics
 By:  gigi , at 02/24/2010 12:01 AM
 Reputation Level: 46
Yeah!None Boo!None
Quoted Shoutback:
I maintain the view that we as individuals are responsible for our actions.

If we act responsibly, governments, corporations, and financial monstrosities will not need to hold our hands and attempt to think for us. This hand holding and constrictive guidance only limits our freedom.


I'm in total agreement. Somehow society has fallen into the belief that the government must take care of them, and tell them what to do. And making matters worse is the fact that people rely on the government and other citizens to bail them out when they screw up, as if they deserve it. So you have a huge portion of the population walking around with a sense of helplessness mixed with a sense of entitlement -- a horrible combination, based entirely on the idea that people aren't responsible for themselves or their actions, and they don't have to be.